The Roar

2022-09-17 04:53:43 By : Mr. Alex NBXIAER

Captured a great grassroots sporting moment? We want to see it!

Become a member to join in Australia's biggest sporting debate, submit articles, receive updates straight to your inbox and keep up with your favourite teams and authors.

Oops! You must provide an email address to create a Roar account

When using Facebook to create or log in to an account, you need to grant The Roar permission to see your email address

By joining The Roar you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

Contribute without a Roar account

New to The Roar? Register for an account

Oops! You must provide an email address to create a Roar account

When using Facebook to create or log in to an account, you need to grant The Roar permission to see your email address

Contribute without a Roar account

Anyone can contribute to The Roar and have their work featured alongside some of Australia’s most prominent sports journalists.

Anyone can contribute to The Roar and have their work featured alongside some of Australia’s most prominent sports journalists.

Is Usain Bolt right to be concerned about the new generation of high-tech footwear that could help others challenge his world records in time given his belief that he would have definitely run below 9.5 seconds if he had access to the same technology?

No, despite the shoes enabling American Noah Lyles to get close to Usain Bolt’s 200m world record of 19.19 during 2022 with a time of 19.31, the third fastest 200m of all-time.

With World Athletics in August 2020 addressing the controversy of the new shoe technology by permitting a heel thickness of up to 40mm in road running shoes and 25mm in distance running spikes, good luck to any runner that can break any world record.

Since 2016 when the new technology was introduced to road running in 2016, the top 50 male and female lists of marathon runners quickly improved by 2 per cent with Kenya’s Eliud Kipchoge achieving a time of 1:59:40.2 during 2019, albeit an unofficial record due to not adhering to competition rules regarding pacing, fluids and being open to all rivals.

Ben Johnson.(Photo by Mike Powell/Getty Images)

With the new technology applied to track spikes since 2019, world records have been set since in 5000m and 10000m (both men and women), the 400m hurdles (both men and women), and the 100m hurdles (women).

At the 2021 Olympic Games, Norway’s Karsten Warholm won the mens 400m hurdles with a time of 45.94 to shatter his own world record of 46.70.

At the 2022 World Championships, Sydney McLaughlin won the womens 400m hurdles with a time of 50.68, also obliterating her own 2021 world record by 0.73 seconds, thus marking the sixth time in three years that the female 400m hurdles record had been broken after Russia’s Yulia Pechonkina’s time of 52.34 had stood for 16 years.

But let us assume that recent world record holders do not use illegal performance-enhancing drugs, albeit we do know that quite a few running medalists have been recently banned for PED use or avoiding tests.

If are to accept that cheating with PEDs is so much harder today, given that a failed test now could be triggered by parts per trillion compared to parts per billion a few decades ago, it may well be that fast shoe technology will offset a decline in performances in coming years and help produce world records over time.

Hence, while Bolt expresses concern that the new technology will help sprinters match his times, the fast shoe technology (affordable for most world class athletes) will prove vastly superior to the level of inconsistency that existed with regard to national drug testing regimes until recently.

For example, it has been well documented that Jamaica had a very poor drug testing protocol right up to the 2012 OG, including “a significant gap of no testing” between March and July 2012 as their athletes prepared for the OG.

A 2020 article, drawing on information obtained from 3863 blood samples at the 2011 and 2013 WC, also estimated an overall blood doping prevalence of 18 per cent in 2011 and 15 per cent in 2013.

Today, it is that much harder for any athlete of any nation to cheat.

As of 26 August 2022, with Kenya having 50 athletes currently suspended because of drug use with only Russia having more banned athletes, Kenya was one of the seven Category A nations deemed by the Athletics Integrity Unit to have the highest doping risk, along with Bahrain, Belarus, Ethiopia, Morocco, Nigeria and Ukraine.

Any athlete from a ‘Category A’ country is only eligible to compete at the Worlds or Olympics by being subject to at least three no-notice out-of-competition tests (urine and blood) that are conducted no less than three weeks apart in the 10 months leading up to a major event.

Gold medalist Usain Bolt of Jamaica. (Photo by Patrick Smith/Getty Images)

In reality, and despite out-of-competition testing being implemented extensively after the 1988 Olympics when 100m winner Ben Johnson was caught on PEDs, the global competitions remained quite unfair for many decades with athletes from nations benefiting from lax testing regimes most.

At the same time, certain Western runners prospered by being supported by the very best knowledge of how to cheat the drug testing with regard to testosterone, growth hormone and other PEDs to boost strength, along with erythropoietin (EPO) which boosts the ‘oxygen carrying’ capacity of blood to aid endurance.

With sporting superstars like Lance Armstrong and Marion Jones only banned through intelligence and the testimony of others, with both athletes passing virtually every drug test throughout their top level careers, it is reasonable to conclude that many champions and running records were influenced by illegal PEDs.

As we know, running performance is improved greatly with PED use.

Take the example of Johnson, caught on steroids in 1988. During 1987 he ran the 60m indoors in 6.41. When he returned from his first two year ban during the 1990-91 indoor season, he ran no better than 6.57 by the end of the 1992-93 indoor season, a time difference of around 2.5 per cent.

Johnson only started to again run fast in 1993 when on testosterone to nearly break the world record for the 50m before again being banned.

Marion Jones. (Photo by David Madison/Getty Images)

A 2019 trial also found that testosterone significantly improves female athletic performance with 48 healthy women (18 to 35 years of age), who were given 10 weeks of daily treatment with 10mg of testosterone cream to raise their circulating levels of testosterone rose from 0.9 nmol/litre of blood to 4.3 nmol/L, improving their running time to exhaustion by an average 8.5 per cent (21.17 seconds) with their lean muscle mass rising by 923gms (398gms in their legs).

With an approved test for EPO only introduced at the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games, a 2013 study by Yiannis Pitsiladis of 10 “trained runners” found four weeks of every-other-day injections of EPO improved their 3000m time by an average of 6 per cent (10:12 to 9:40) with a three per cent advantage still evident some four weeks later with no additional EPO injections.

A 2013 study of 20 Kenyan runners who trained at altitude also found similar improvement from EPO use, thus refuting the claim by the famous Italian running coach Renato Canova who repeatedly claimed that EPO did not help Kenyan athletes.

If we are to accept that drug testing has gradually improved, including since 2005 when the sport began to store athlete samples for enhanced testing by freezing blood and urine samples for retrospective testing, the fast shoes can be seen as a fair way to help get rid of tainted records over time.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

But, if PEDs are still an issue, with a 2020 article highlighting the ongoing difficulty of testing for the microdosing of hormones that clear the body quickly, we can only hope that the testing system keeps getting better to expose and prevent drug cheats.

A talented athlete on PEDs, as well as the new shoes, will ultimately set more world records, including challenging those held by the great Usain Bolt.

Whatever the true current situation, it is difficult to compare the great champions simply based on times because the context changes from year to year with regard to different influences, whether it be fast tracks, fast shoes or PEDs.

This is why I enjoy watching the championships on a year by basis, choosing to downplay claims that recent world records are amongst the greatest of all-time given that each race may be influenced by very different factors.